# Change Management Policy

**Organization:** {{COMPANY_LEGAL_NAME}}
**Document owner:** {{POLICY_OWNER_ROLE}}
**Approved by:** {{APPROVER_NAME}}, {{APPROVER_TITLE}}
**Version:** {{VERSION}} · **Effective:** {{EFFECTIVE_DATE}} · **Next review:** {{REVIEW_DATE}}
**Classification:** Internal

---

## 1. Purpose

This policy exists so that {{COMPANY_LEGAL_NAME}} ships code, infrastructure, and configuration changes safely and predictably. Disciplined change control protects {{DATA_TYPES}} in the workloads running on {{CRITICAL_SYSTEMS}} and keeps services stable for users across {{GEO_SCOPE}}.

## 2. Scope

The policy covers production systems, customer-facing services, shared libraries, and core infrastructure that run in {{CRITICAL_SYSTEMS}} or that can affect access to {{DATA_TYPES}}. It applies to the {{LOCATION}} workforce working from managed {{DEVICE_TYPES}}.

## 3. Policy statements

### 3.1 Change request and approval

Every change starts with a ticket that describes its scope, its risk, and a rollback plan. A peer review or manager approval is required before merge or deployment, commits and pipelines are linked back to the ticket, and ad-hoc changes directly in {{CRITICAL_SYSTEMS}} are not allowed. We record the approver, the date and time, and the supporting artifacts such as diffs and test results.

### 3.2 Testing and impact review

Changes are validated with unit and integration tests or a staging deployment wherever feasible. We assess the security impact of each change and add security tests for higher-risk work, especially anything that touches {{DATA_TYPES}} or {{CRITICAL_SYSTEMS}}. Test results and sign-offs are retained, and a release is blocked when tests fail.

### 3.3 Release scheduling and communication

Non-urgent releases are scheduled during low-traffic windows for users in {{GEO_SCOPE}}, and stakeholders receive at least 24 hours' notice of any expected downtime. We keep a release calendar with approved change windows.

### 3.4 Emergency changes

Emergency changes are permitted only to restore service or to fix a critical security flaw. They are flagged as emergencies, linked to the relevant incident, and documented retrospectively within 24 hours so they can be picked up at the next review.

### 3.5 Post-implementation review

After a change we confirm the success metrics and error budgets held, and we capture lessons learned in release notes or a short retrospective. Outcomes and action items are attached to the change record and tracked to completion.

### 3.6 Measuring compliance

Every production commit should have a linked, approved ticket, and we track and review the failed-change rate. For teams larger than {{EMPLOYEE_COUNT}} we widen sampling and add random checks of releases into {{CRITICAL_SYSTEMS}}.

### 3.7 Continual improvement

We analyse change-failure trends each quarter and refine our pipeline and testing approach, taking {{INDUSTRY}} needs and obligations affecting {{GEO_SCOPE}} into account.

## 4. Roles and responsibilities

| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Executive sponsor | Accountable for the program; approves this policy |
| {{POLICY_OWNER_ROLE}} | Maintains this policy and its procedures |
| Managers | Enforce the policy within their teams |
| All personnel | Comply; report issues promptly |

## 5. Compliance and exceptions

Non-compliance may result in disciplinary action, and an unauthorised change triggers a rollback and disciplinary review. Exceptions follow the emergency-change path only and require documented risk acceptance by {{APPROVER_TITLE}}; they are time-limited and reviewed.

## 6. Review

This policy is reviewed at least annually and when significant change occurs.

---

*Aligned to AICPA SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria). {{COMPANY_LEGAL_NAME}} is not affiliated with or endorsed by the relevant standards body; full standard text is copyrighted and is not reproduced here.*