What is the difference between SOC 2 Type I and Type II?
A SOC 2 Type I report evaluates whether your controls are suitably designed at a single point in time. A Type II goes further and tests whether those controls actually operated effectively over a period, commonly 3 to 12 months. Type II is the report most enterprise customers ask for, because it shows controls work over time, not just on paper on one day.
Type I: a point-in-time design opinion
A Type I is an attestation, by a licensed CPA firm, that your controls are designed appropriately as of a specific date. It does not test whether they ran consistently over time, so it is faster to obtain and is often used as a first step.
Type II: operating effectiveness over a window
A Type II covers a period (the observation window), commonly 3 to 12 months, and tests that controls operated effectively throughout. That requires evidence each control ran consistently across the whole window, which is the real work.
Which one do you need?
Most buyers eventually want a Type II. A common path is a Type I first to demonstrate design, then a Type II covering the following period. Some organizations go straight to a Type II. Ask the customers requesting a report which they need.
FAQ
Is a Type I or Type II better?
Type II is more rigorous and more widely requested because it tests controls over time. Type I is a valid, faster first step that shows controls are well designed, but it is not a substitute for a Type II when a customer specifically asks for one.
How long does a Type II observation period need to be?
Commonly 3 to 12 months. A first Type II often uses a shorter window (such as 3 months) to reach a report sooner, then subsequent reports typically cover a full year.
Get audit-ready with Keel
The AI-native GRC platform for SMBs: one control-and-evidence graph across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF, and more. Start free, no credit card.
Start free