Crosswalk pair

FedRAMP Consolidated Rules and ISO 9001, control by control

1 canonical control in Keel’s library satisfies clauses of both FedRAMP Consolidated Rules and ISO 9001. Implement each once, attach the evidence once, and it counts toward each standard. The overlap is the work you don’t repeat.

Start free with FedRAMP Consolidated Rules + ISO 9001 See all pairs

The overlap

What the two libraries have in common

Every figure here counts canonical controls in Keel’s library, not clauses of either standard. Each standard’s own authored count is on its framework page.

1

Controls that satisfy both

Canonical controls that crosswalk to at least one clause of each.

23

In Keel’s library for FedRAMP Consolidated Rules

4% of them also map to ISO 9001.

43

In Keel’s library for ISO 9001

2% of them also map to FedRAMP Consolidated Rules.

5

Evidence artifacts expected

Across the shared controls, from Keel’s evidence guidance. Gathered once.

FedRAMP Consolidated Rules 2026 4%

1 control of 23 in Keel’s library for FedRAMP Consolidated Rules also maps to ISO 9001.
ISO 9001 2015 2%

1 control of 43 in Keel’s library for ISO 9001 also maps to FedRAMP Consolidated Rules.

The mapping

Controls that satisfy both

Each row is one control in Keel’s library and the clauses it answers on each side. Do the work once; both columns are then evidenced by the same artifacts.

FedRAMP Consolidated Rules and ISO 9001 controls that satisfy both, with the clauses each maps to
Canonical control	FedRAMP Consolidated Rules clauses	ISO 9001 clauses
Document & records control Documented information is created, approved, versioned, and controlled; records are retained and protected for a defined minimum period - measured from the document’s creation OR from the date it last was in effect, whichever is later, so a policy that stayed in force for years does not start its clock on the day it was written - and are available to the people who have to act on the procedures they describe. Documentation is reviewed on a schedule and updated when an operational, environmental or legal change has made the current version wrong. A change forced by law is documented and put into effect promptly, and where that legal change materially affects what the organization has published to individuals about how it handles their data, THAT NOTICE IS REVISED TOO, as part of the same prompt action rather than as a separate task left to whoever owns the notice. Any other change may be made at any time provided the revised version still complies and IS DOCUMENTED BEFORE THE CHANGE TAKES EFFECT - the record precedes the effective date, so a routine that documents changes in arrears does not discharge this. Records are protected for as long as they are kept, and against more than deletion: against loss, against destruction, against falsification, against being read by somebody with no entitlement to them, and against being released outside the organization without authority. The protection applied to a class of record is decided from the requirements attached to it - what the law, the regulator or the contract demands of that record type, and what it would cost if it were lost or altered - rather than from where it happens to be stored. Records are held so that a change to one is attributable and detectable rather than silent, the storage medium and format are chosen to remain readable for the whole retention period and the information is migrated before either stops being so, and the ability to retrieve a record intact is exercised rather than assumed. What the set of documented information consists of is itself a decision rather than an accumulation: it comprises the documented information the standard the system is built against explicitly requires, plus whatever else the organization determines is necessary for the system to be effective - and the second half is decided against the size of the organization and the kind of activity, product and service it deals in, the complexity of its processes, and the competence of its people, so a small organization is not judged against a large one’s binder and a large one cannot claim a small one’s.	SCG-ENH-VRH	7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.5.3.1, 7.5.3.2

Beyond the pair

Where else this work counts

A framework is lit when a shared control above also maps to it. Unlit means none of them do, which is an absence rather than a judgment about that standard.

Also reached by this control

AI Governance Essentials not reached
Amazon Appstore Child-Directed Apps not reached
Apple App Store Kids Category not reached
CIS Critical Security Controls not reached
COPPA not reached
ESG Essentials not reached
EU AI Act not reached
FedRAMP 20x not reached
FedRAMP Rev5 Class B not reached
FedRAMP Rev5 Class C not reached
FedRAMP Rev5 Class D not reached
GDPR not reached
Google Play Families not reached
HIPAA also reached
ISO/IEC 27001 also reached
ISO/IEC 42001 also reached
NIST AI Risk Management Framework not reached
NIST Cybersecurity Framework not reached
NIST SP 800-171 not reached
NIST SP 800-53 not reached
PCI DSS not reached
PIPEDA not reached
SOC 2 also reached
SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404 also reached
US Employment Law - Federal Baseline not reached

Nearby pairs

The thesis

Why this is one project, not two

On a crosswalk-native model, ISO 9001 mostly lights up controls you already built for FedRAMP Consolidated Rules. You’re not re-uploading the same screenshot for a second audit. You apply the framework and see the genuine delta worth working. That’s the whole idea behind collect once, comply everywhere.

Next step

Add ISO 9001 to the work you already did

Apply both frameworks in one workspace and see the overlap measured against the controls you already hold.

Start free with FedRAMP Consolidated Rules + ISO 9001 See all pairs