← Crosswalk explorer

ISO 9001 SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404

9 canonical controls in Keel’s library satisfy clauses of both ISO 9001 and SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404. Implement each once, attach the evidence once, and it counts toward each standard. The overlap is the work you don’t repeat.

9 shared controls ISO 9001 · 2015: 15 in library SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404 · Act of 2002 §404; COSO 2013 framework, 17 principles: 30 in library
Start free with ISO 9001 + SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404 See all pairs

Controls that satisfy both

Canonical control ISO 9001 clauses SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404 clauses
Risk assessment & treatment
A documented process to identify, analyze, evaluate, and treat information security risks on a defined cadence.
6.1 P6, P7, P9
Change management
Changes to systems and software are requested, reviewed, tested, approved, and tracked.
6.3 P9, P11
Third-party / vendor risk management
Due diligence, contractual safeguards, and ongoing monitoring of vendors that handle your data.
8.4 P11, P15
Security awareness training
Ongoing security awareness training for all personnel, with completion tracking.
7.2, 7.3 P4, P14
Document & records control
Documented information is created, approved, versioned, and controlled; records are retained and protected.
7.5 P12, P13
Competence management
Roles requiring competence are defined; training and evaluation ensure personnel are qualified.
7.2 P4
Internal audit program
A risk-based internal audit program evaluates conformity and effectiveness at planned intervals.
9.2 P16
Management review
Leadership reviews management-system performance at planned intervals and drives improvement decisions.
9.3 P2, P16, P17
Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)
Nonconforming outputs are controlled; root causes are analyzed and corrective actions tracked to closure.
8.7, 10.2 P17

Clause identifiers (ISO 9001 and SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404) are referenced factually for mapping. Keel is not affiliated with or endorsed by the bodies that publish these standards. Control descriptions are Keel’s own; a framework’s full authored control count is on its framework page.

Why this is one project, not two

On a crosswalk-native model, SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Section 404 mostly lights up controls you already built for ISO 9001. You’re not re-uploading the same screenshot for a second audit. You apply the framework and see the genuine delta worth working. That’s the whole idea behind collect once, comply everywhere.