What ESG Essentials covers, and what it deliberately does not
ESG Essentials is Keel-authored. No external standard governs it, so there is no official requirement count for it to be complete against, and that is permanent rather than a number waiting to be verified. It has 25+ scored requirements, every one of them written by Keel.
The honest boundary for a Keel-authored framework is a different one. There is no standard here to leave provisions out of. What there is instead is a set of choices about what a baseline should ask a small company to do, and the checklist those choices were tested against. Both are below.
The checklist it was tested against
The 2026-08-13 enrichment used ISO 26000:2010's core subjects of social responsibility as a checklist of what to cover, and the gaps it exposed were then written from scratch in Keel's words. That does not make ISO 26000 its source standard. ISO 26000 is guidance: it contains no requirements, and nobody can be certified against it. Keel ships no ISO 26000 framework and scores nobody against it.
-
6.2Organizational governanceISO 26000 lists no issues under this subject.
-
6.3Some issues not modeledHuman rightsSpeaks to some of the issues ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
-
6.4Labour practicesSpeaks to every issue ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
-
6.5The environmentSpeaks to every issue ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
-
6.6Fair operating practicesSpeaks to every issue ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
-
6.7Consumer issuesSpeaks to every issue ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
-
6.8Some issues not modeledCommunity involvement and developmentSpeaks to some of the issues ISO 26000 lists under this subject.
The issues deliberately not modeled
A statement about subjects invites a reader to assume completeness at the level below, which would be false, so here are the gaps. There is no obligation to close them: ISO 26000 is not this framework's source standard, and completing against a guidance document with no requirements is not a coherent goal.
-
6.3.8Civil and political rightsCivil and political rights. ISO addresses this mainly at states and at organizations whose operations bear on them; Keel has no baseline expectation an SMB could evidence, and inventing one would be padding.
-
6.3.9Economic, social and cultural rightsEconomic, social and cultural rights. Same reason - the concrete SMB-facing parts (pay, conditions, non-discrimination, access to services) are already asked for at S.3, S.13, S.2 and S.18, and a separate leaf would double-count.
-
6.8.4Education and cultureEducation and culture in the community. Real, but discretionary program work rather than a baseline expectation; S.23 covers community investment generally without prescribing this form of it.
-
6.8.6Technology development and accessTechnology development and access. Applies to organizations whose technology or IP affects development outcomes; not a baseline every SMB can act on.
-
6.8.8HealthCommunity health. S.1 covers worker health and safety and S.16 product safety; community health programs are sector-specific and not part of this baseline.
Where the checklist came from
Think one of these belongs in the baseline? That is the point of publishing it, so tell us which one. There is more on why ISO 26000 cannot be certified against at is ISO 26000 certifiable, and the full framework is at ESG Essentials.